His stated goal was to ruin her life and cause her to kill herself. and contained private information about her family, friends and associates. Supreme Court jury found him guilty of using the website to harass D.C., a woman whose name and identity is protected by a publication ban.Ī website that Fox had set up was designed to denigrate, humiliate and intimidate D.C. She ruled that he was owner of the website in question and controlled it, even though he said he was not, and that the probation required him to take it down from the internet after being released from jail and “he failed to do so.”įox was first convicted in July 2017, when a B.C. The appeal judges dismissed the appeal, ruling “there was a sound basis for the conviction” and that the judge didn’t make any legal errors but based her ruling on the fact she “did not believe the appellant’s evidence.” The Crown asked for the appeal to be thrown out. Article contentįox sought an overturning of the latest lower-court ruling because he said the judge committed legal errors and that his trial was unfair because the judge “misinterpreted the probation order, misapprehended evidence and failed to ask him clarifying questions when he testified,” according to court documents. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Manage Print Subscription / Tax Receipt.
0 kommentar(er)
